Casual manner. It’s only when you step back, stop looking at the wires one by one, microscopically, and take a
macroscopic view of the entire cage, that you can see why the bird will not go anyplace; and then you’ll see it in
a minute. It’s going to need no great subtlety of mental abilities. It is perfectly clear the fowl is encircled by a
network of methodically associated impediments, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its flight, but which, by
toward women, and reinforces patterns of male domination over women.111
In our culture, breasts could be exposed to sell drinks to guys in taverns, but women might not be topfree on a
beach for their own comfort and happiness. Reena Glazer writes: “The criminalization of women baring their breasts,
Consequently, signifies that society views women’s bodies as immoral and something to conceal. There is something
Possibly offender about every girl just by virtue of being female.” 112
Herald Price Fahringer writes, “men possess the right to cover or expose as they see fit–girls do
not. Guys have the right to take pleasure in the sun, water, and wind with no top; women do not. Few guys would be willing
Then why should not girls enjoy the same edge? . . . Demanding girls to cover their
breasts in public is a very visible expression of inequality between men and women that encourages an approach that
For countless decades, men have held the power to generate these
misconceptions. The male view on the vulnerability of a female ‘s breasts is crucially influenced by the demand of men to
This reaction stems from a manly ideology that has . . . doomed generations of girls to a
secondary status.” 113
“So what is actually at stake is whether women will probably be free to bare their own
breasts in suitable public places for their own personal purposes on such occasions in which they feel free to do
so, or whether they’ll only be permitted to bare their breasts in public on an occasion that may be used
commercially and that bolsters the idea the only role of the female breast is for the satisfaction of man
Purportedly cause in men. Such laws are written entirely from the male perspective, and ignore the point of view of
women, who may want to go topfree for their very own relaxation.
82. By refusing to accept the demand to “protect” themselves from guys by covering their bodies, girls increase
power, and shift the burden of responsible behavior to men, where it rightfully belongs.
Reena Glazer notes that “male power is perpetuated by regarding women as items that guys behave and respond
to rather than as celebrities themselves. . . . their entire value comes from the reaction they are able to induce from guys. In
Because women are the
sexual objects and property of men, it follows that what might arouse guys are only able to be be shown when men desire to
be aroused.” This emphasis on women as temptresses “shifts the load of responsibility from men to women;
because women induce uncontrollable urges in males, society justifies male behaviour and blames the victim for
whatever occurs. . . . To sanction the concept that men have uncontrollable urges indicates that violence against
Girls is inescapable.” 115
83. girls naked cigarette smoking beach strip women of the right to control their own bodies, but there have always been
“exceptions” to obscenity laws which enable the usage of women’s bodies in consumer seduction. Therefore female nudity
is considered unsuitable on the shore, but is ubiquitous in advertising and porn.
84. By demanding arbitrary clothing requirements for girls (requiring them to cover their tops), the
Authorities acts in loco parentis, in the part of a parent. This really is demeaning to women. Like kids, they’re not
Surrendered the ability or right to decide how to dress, much as they once weren’t permitted to vote, own property, or
exercise other rights.116
85. The repression of healthful female nudity fuels porn.
Herbert Muschamp notes: “To object to the naked figure in a general interest magazine while enabling it